Business I / Income and Substitution Effects
Practice question · Multiple choice

For a Giffen good, demand rises when the price rises. Why does that not refute the law of demand?

Hints
  1. Split the price change into substitution and income effects and sign each one.
  2. Which effect can point the "wrong" way, and for which kind of good?
Show the answer

C. Because the law describes the substitution effect alone

Why

Slutsky is what makes the anomaly legible. A price rise on a staple consuming much of a poor household’s budget makes it poorer, and the income effect on an inferior good can dominate.

Read the lesson: Income and Substitution Effects →

Practise Income and Substitution Effects

The app has 8 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Business I is free to start.

More questions on Income and Substitution Effects