Practice question · Multiple choice
Roman grain moved thousands of kilometres by sea and a fraction of that distance by land cost more. What single ratio explains the pattern?
Hints
- An ox pulling a cart must be fed. Ask what fraction of the cargo it eats over 500 km.
- What does a ship spend to cross the same distance?
Show the answer
C. The cost of water transport against land, an order apart
Why
An ox eats its cargo over a few hundred kilometres and a sail costs nothing, so the economic map was drawn by water rather than by distance. It is why Rome fed itself from Egypt rather than from inland Italy, and why the railway's real achievement was making land transport comparable at all.
Practise Economic Geography and Trade Routes
The app has 4 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. History I is free to start.
More questions on Economic Geography and Trade Routes
- Containerisation meant value density stopped governing what could be shipped. Why did that change WHERE…
- "Bulk goods do not travel far" is a permanent law of economic geography.
- Why is grain the instructive case?
- Goods travelled the length of the Silk Road but individual merchants generally did not. What does that…
- Why was Rome’s knowledge of China so poor despite the silk trade?
- Sort each consequence of the relay structure.
- Why did containerisation transform shipping costs when the ocean crossing itself was already cheap?