Practice question · Multiple choice
Formal analysis asks how a picture works on the eye; iconology asks why this image appeared here and now. Why can iconology not simply replace formal analysis?
Hints
- Ask what iconology is interpreting.
- Could the same reading be attached, unchanged, to a different painting?
Show the answer
A. Because the meaning is borne by the form, not laid beside it
Why
Panofsky’s levels are cumulative, not alternative. Without the description you cannot say which features do the work, and the interpretation floats free of the picture it claims to explain.
Practise Methodologies of Art History
The app has 5 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. History I is free to start.
More questions on Methodologies of Art History
- Order Panofsky’s levels from the least to the most interpretive.
- Match each attribute to the figure it identifies.
- Egyptian tomb paintings of overflowing granaries are reliable evidence that famine never occurred.
- Panofsky separated identifying a figure holding a knife as Saint Bartholomew from asking why this patron…
- Sort each observation: formal analysis or iconography?
- Which are legitimate historical uses of a commissioned portrait?