Practice question · Select all that apply
Which constraints do historians cite when explaining British policy in the later 1930s?
Hints
- Three of these are real pressures on British decision-making; the fourth invents a legal bar.
- Ask what a global empire with three potential enemies has to plan for at once.
Show the answer
- A. Japan and Italy posed simultaneous threats in other theatres
- B. Rearmament was incomplete and the Treasury feared losing a long war through overspending
- D. The Dominions were unwilling to support a European war
Why
The constraint-based account does not claim Munich was right; it claims the alternatives in 1938 were worse than the retrospective view assumes. The counter-argument is that constraints and choices coexist: Britain and France were far stronger relative to Germany in 1936, when the Rhineland was remilitarised and nothing was done.
Practise The Road to the Second World War
The app has 7 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. History II is free to start.
More questions on The Road to the Second World War
- Germany occupied the remainder of Bohemia and Moravia in March 1939, six months after Munich. Why is that…
- Arrange these acts of aggression and diplomacy in order.
- Historians debate whether British policy was shaped primarily by severe structural constraints or by the…
- Arrange the steps by which each unpunished action lowered the cost of the next.
- In which year was the Munich agreement signed, transferring the Sudetenland to Germany?
- Sort each statement by whether it describes the SOVIET UNION in the 1930s or the WESTERN POWERS.
- Historians distinguish between explaining a decision and justifying it. How does that distinction apply to…