Languages I / Animal Communication
Practice question · Sort into groups

Sort each observation by whether it supports a RICH interpretation of ape language studies or a SCEPTICAL one.

Groups: Supports a rich reading · Supports a sceptical reading

Hints
  1. One column is about what the animals produced spontaneously; the other about what the record shows on re-analysis.
  2. Terrace's re-analysis of his own project supplies most of the sceptical column.
Show the answer

Supports a rich reading: Kanzi responded correctly to novel spoken instructions, Vocabularies reached hundreds of symbols

Supports a sceptical reading: Mean utterance length did not grow as a child's does, Many reported combinations were prompted by the experimenter

Why

Both columns are real, which is why the honest summary keeps both halves: symbols are clearly acquired and used intentionally, and hierarchical recursive syntax has not been demonstrated. Terrace's willingness to re-analyse his own data against his own hypothesis is the methodological lesson of the episode.

Read the lesson: Animal Communication →

Practise Animal Communication

The app has 5 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Languages I is free to start.

More questions on Animal Communication