Practice question · Multiple choice
Speech is rated as heavily accented and transcribed with complete accuracy. Why is that not a contradiction on Munro and Derwing's framework?
Hints
- The two were measured by different methods and gave different answers.
- If transcription is perfect, understanding did not fail.
Show the answer
B. Intelligibility and accentedness are partly independent, so a strong accent need not impede understanding
Why
That the dimensions are partly independent. Perfect transcription means intelligibility was complete; a high accent rating means the speech was audibly non-local. Both can be true at once, and separating them is what allows a learner to aim at being understood rather than at sounding native.
Practise Stress, Rhythm and Intelligibility
The app has 5 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Languages I is free to start.
More questions on Stress, Rhythm and Intelligibility
- English word stress is contrastive: moving it can change one word into another.
- Sort each feature by whether Jenkins's Lingua Franca Core finds it MATTERS for international intelligibility…
- Jenkins excludes word-level stress from the Lingua Franca Core yet includes nuclear stress. What explains…
- How many dimensions of listener judgement do Munro and Derwing separate?
- Which are true of nuclear stress in English?
- Simplifying an initial consonant cluster by deleting a sound damages intelligibility more than by inserting a…
- Arrange these pronunciation priorities in the order Jenkins's findings suggest for a learner aiming at…