Practice question · Multiple choice
A novel that scandalised its first readers is set for schoolchildren three generations later, with not a word of it changed. Why, on Jauss’s account, does it now read as unremarkable?
Hints
- The work is unchanged, so whatever changed is on the reader’s side.
- Jauss calls the gap between work and expectation the aesthetic distance.
Show the answer
D. The horizon of expectations shifted, closing aesthetic distance the work opened
Why
Because the horizon moved. Aesthetic distance is the gap between a work and what its public expects, and a work that opens a wide gap teaches its successors to expect what it did. Three generations on, those expectations are ordinary, which is why the history of a work’s reception is part of the work rather than a record of opinions about it.
Practise The Sociology of Reading
The app has 6 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Literature I is free to start.
More questions on The Sociology of Reading
- For Fish, the properties a reader finds in a text are produced by the interpretive community's way of reading.
- Arrange these interventions in the sociology and reception of literature by date.
- Bourdieu describes the autonomous pole of the literary field as 'the economic world reversed'. What does this…
- Which are true of Bourdieu's literary field?
- If about 20,000 novels were published in nineteenth-century Britain and roughly 200 are canonical, what…