Mathematics I / Higher Derivatives and Concavity
Practice question · Multiple choice

If f''(c) = 0, the point c need not be an inflection point - x⁴ at x = 0 is the standard counterexample. Why is a vanishing second derivative not enough?

Hints
  1. Compute f'' for x⁴ and check its sign just left and just right of zero.
  2. What does "inflection" actually assert about the bending of the curve?
Show the answer

A. Because concavity must change sign, and for x⁴ it does not.

Why

For x⁴ the second derivative is 12x², zero at the origin and positive on both sides, so the curve never changes its bending. An inflection needs a sign change, as x³ supplies. It is exactly parallel to the first-derivative case, f'(c) = 0 does not give an extremum, since x³ has a horizontal tangent and neither. Zeros locate candidates; sign changes confirm them.

Read the lesson: Higher Derivatives and Concavity →

Practise Higher Derivatives and Concavity

The app has 5 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Mathematics I is free to start.

More questions on Higher Derivatives and Concavity