Mathematics I / Implication and Equivalence
Practice question · Multiple choice

A theorem's proof establishes p → q. A student concludes that q is true. What has gone wrong, and what would be needed?

Hints
  1. 'If it rains, the match is cancelled' is proved. Is the match cancelled?
  2. Ask what a conditional actually asserts about q on its own.
Show the answer

D. The implication only transfers truth if p is established

Why

A conditional promises q given p and says nothing on its own. Modus ponens needs both the implication and the premise, and forgetting the second is how a correctly proved theorem gets applied to a case it never covered, which is most of what goes wrong when a result is used outside its hypotheses.

Read the lesson: Implication and Equivalence →

Practise Implication and Equivalence

The app has 7 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Mathematics I is free to start.

More questions on Implication and Equivalence