Practice question · Multiple choice
Three vectors in three-dimensional space, no one of them a scalar multiple of any other, can still be linearly dependent. Why is pairwise non-proportionality not enough?
Hints
- Take (1,0,0), (0,1,0) and (1,1,0). Is any one a multiple of another? Are they independent?
- Dependence says some combination gives zero - how many vectors may that combination involve?
Show the answer
A. Because the third can lie in the plane spanned by the first two.
Why
The counterexample settles it: among (1,0,0), (0,1,0) and (1,1,0) no vector is a multiple of another, and the third is the sum of the first two. Pairwise checking asks about one other vector; dependence asks whether any non-trivial combination of all of them vanishes. Independence does not require orthogonality either, (1,0) and (1,1) are independent and not perpendicular.
Practise Linear Independence
The app has 5 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Mathematics I is free to start.
More questions on Linear Independence
- Sort each set of vectors by whether it is linearly independent.
- The set {u, v, w} is linearly DEPENDENT. Select every statement that must then be true.
- Order the steps of testing whether three vectors in space are linearly independent.
- In a machine learning dataset, two features are recorded: temperature in Celsius and the same temperature in…
- A set of three vectors in three-dimensional space in which no vector is a scalar multiple of any other must…