Mathematics I / Linear Independence
Practice question · Multiple choice

Three vectors in three-dimensional space, no one of them a scalar multiple of any other, can still be linearly dependent. Why is pairwise non-proportionality not enough?

Hints
  1. Take (1,0,0), (0,1,0) and (1,1,0). Is any one a multiple of another? Are they independent?
  2. Dependence says some combination gives zero - how many vectors may that combination involve?
Show the answer

A. Because the third can lie in the plane spanned by the first two.

Why

The counterexample settles it: among (1,0,0), (0,1,0) and (1,1,0) no vector is a multiple of another, and the third is the sum of the first two. Pairwise checking asks about one other vector; dependence asks whether any non-trivial combination of all of them vanishes. Independence does not require orthogonality either, (1,0) and (1,1) are independent and not perpendicular.

Read the lesson: Linear Independence →

Practise Linear Independence

The app has 5 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Mathematics I is free to start.

More questions on Linear Independence