Philosophy I / The Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus
Practice question · Multiple choice

Why would the atomists make the apparently self-defeating claim that what-is-not exists?

Hints
  1. The claim is aimed precisely at the premise that blocked motion.
  2. Granting the void as real restores motion, plurality and change at once.
Show the answer

A. That the void is a real feature of the world, so motion has somewhere to occur

Why

The void is emptiness that genuinely obtains, a real feature rather than a substance. Granting it directly contradicts the premise that had made motion impossible, and everything else in the theory follows.

Read the lesson: The Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus →

Practise The Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus

The app has 5 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Philosophy I is free to start.

More questions on The Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus