Practice question · Multiple choice
A longitudinal study follows the same people for thirty years; a cross-sectional study compares different age groups on one afternoon. Each design's main strength is the other's main weakness. What is the trade?
Hints
- Ask what each design compares a person against: other people, or their own earlier self?
- Following people for thirty years has a cost that has nothing to do with money.
Show the answer
B. Longitudinal holds the person constant; cross-sectional confounds cohort.
Why
A longitudinal study compares each person with themselves, so generation cancels, it measures change rather than difference. The cost is not merely time: attrition is selective toward poorer health, so the surviving sample looks better than the cohort it started as, which can hide the very decline the study was built to detect.
Practise Advanced Methodologies
The app has 5 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Psychology I is free to start.
More questions on Advanced Methodologies
- Order the steps of conducting a meta-analysis.
- A cross-sectional finding that 70-year-olds score lower than 30-year-olds shows that reasoning declines with…
- Sort each strength or weakness under the design it describes.
- A cross-sectional study finds 70-year-olds score lower on reasoning than 30-year-olds. Why does the Flynn…
- A meta-analysis pools ten studies of 40 participants each and reports a precise overall effect. Why does…