Practice question · Multiple choice
Extraversion is one of the Big Five, arrived at by factor-analysing thousands of trait descriptions. The concept itself came from Jung, whose method was clinical intuition. Why is that origin worth knowing rather than a historical footnote?
Hints
- Ask what would have happened to the concept if the factor analyses had come out differently.
- Does a good idea's later confirmation say anything about the method that generated it?
Show the answer
B. Because a construct can be proposed weakly and later vindicated.
Why
The trajectory separates two things that get conflated: where a hypothesis comes from and what justifies it. Clinical observation is a fine way to generate ideas and a poor way to test them, and the factor analyses had no interest in Jung. The test could have failed, and for the rest of his typology it did, so we know which of his ideas was good, and why.
Practise Psychoanalytic Perspectives
The app has 6 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Psychology I is free to start.
More questions on Psychoanalytic Perspectives
- Jung, Horney and Adler all trained in Freud's circle and all broke with him. What did their departures have…
- Select every statement that is TRUE about psychoanalytic views of personality.
- Freud's defence mechanisms are largely absent from modern personality theory, yet projection and…
- Horney argued that a child who feels unsafe develops basic anxiety, and copes by moving toward, against, or…
- Although extraversion is one of the Big Five dimensions today, the introversion-extraversion distinction…