Practice question · Multiple choice
A study promises confidentiality: the researchers know who said what but will not disclose it. Another promises anonymity: nobody, including the researchers, can link a response to a person. Why does the difference matter for what a participant is actually risking?
Hints
- Ask what physically exists in each case. Is there a file linking names to answers?
- A promise can be broken, or compelled. What cannot?
Show the answer
C. Because confidentiality keeps a link that anonymity never creates.
Why
Confidentiality is an undertaking about behaviour — the key exists and can be subpoenaed, stolen or carried out by a departing lab member — where anonymity removes the possibility rather than promising against it. Longitudinal work must keep a link, and the honest position there is to promise confidentiality and secure it, not to call it anonymity.
Practise Research Ethics
The app has 5 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Psychology I is free to start.
More questions on Research Ethics
- Select every statement that is TRUE about research ethics.
- Research with children requires a parent's consent and the child's assent. Why insist on both when the parent…
- Milgram's study required participants to believe they were administering real shocks; telling them the truth…
- Order the stages of ethical oversight for a deceptive study, from the earliest to the last.
- Obtaining a signed consent form is enough to make a study ethical, even if the IRB never reviewed it and…
- Sort each item by whether it is an ethical protection for participants or a genuine violation.