Psychology I / Research Ethics
Practice question · Multiple choice

A study promises confidentiality: the researchers know who said what but will not disclose it. Another promises anonymity: nobody, including the researchers, can link a response to a person. Why does the difference matter for what a participant is actually risking?

Hints
  1. Ask what physically exists in each case. Is there a file linking names to answers?
  2. A promise can be broken, or compelled. What cannot?
Show the answer

C. Because confidentiality keeps a link that anonymity never creates.

Why

Confidentiality is an undertaking about behaviour — the key exists and can be subpoenaed, stolen or carried out by a departing lab member — where anonymity removes the possibility rather than promising against it. Longitudinal work must keep a link, and the honest position there is to promise confidentiality and secure it, not to call it anonymity.

Read the lesson: Research Ethics →

Practise Research Ethics

The app has 5 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Psychology I is free to start.

More questions on Research Ethics