Practice question · Multiple choice
Whitehall found that senior administrators had worse health than the permanent secretaries above them - not merely that the lowest grade did worst of all. Why does a step at every rung, rather than a cliff at the bottom, change what you can conclude?
Hints
- Senior administrators are not short of food, heat or medical care. Whatever separates them from the grade above is not deprivation.
- Ask what kind of cause could produce a difference at every single rung, including the top ones.
Show the answer
B. Because a step at every rung points to relative standing.
Why
A cliff and a gradient accuse different suspects. Deprivation stops mattering above a line; rank does not, and these were civil servants, all employed, all housed, all covered by the same health service. That is what forces the explanation toward control, security and where you stand relative to the person above you.
Practise Social Inequality and Health
The app has 7 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Psychology I is free to start.
More questions on Social Inequality and Health
- Select every statement that is TRUE about social inequality and health.
- Match each concrete case to the concept it illustrates.
- Allostatic load is described as the price of adapting successfully. Why is that phrasing deliberate rather…
- According to the Whitehall data, even a comfortably middle-tier employee tends to have worse health than…
- Two departments have identical pay and hours. One runs on fixed rotas set head-office; the other lets staff…