Practice question · Multiple choice
A study measures social support and health in two groups: people living through severe stress, and people whose lives are currently calm. Support predicts noticeably better health among the stressed, and makes almost no difference among the calm. Which model does this pattern favour, and why?
Hints
- The two models disagree about WHEN support should help, so look at where the benefit appeared and where it did not.
- Ask what the direct effects model would have predicted for the calm group.
Show the answer
C. The buffering model, whose claim is that support works against stress.
Why
A buffer is worth exactly what it absorbs, so its value should shrink where there is little impact, and it did. The calm group is what makes this evidence rather than a shrug: direct effects predicted a benefit there too, and its absence is what separates the two models.
Practise Social Support
The app has 5 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Psychology I is free to start.
More questions on Social Support
- Perceived support, believing help would come, often predicts health better than support actually received.…
- A person with many acquaintances but no one they truly trust can feel less supported than someone with just…
- A man recovering from surgery has relatives who do everything for him, cooking, dressing, refusing to let him…
- Sort each claim by the model of social support it expresses.
- Support can sometimes make an outcome worse, recipients of heavy practical help occasionally recover more…
- One friend says "call me if you need anything." Another turns up on Tuesday with soup. Research says the…