Psychology I / The Bystander Effect and the Diffusion of Responsibility
Practice question · Multiple choice

Latané and Darley found that a lone bystander helped about 85% of the time and one among five helped about 31%. Why does adding witnesses make each individual less likely to act, when the need is unchanged?

Hints
  1. Two separate things change when four more people walk in. One is about duty, one is about interpretation.
  2. Everyone is standing still and looking calm. What does each person conclude from that?
Show the answer

C. Because responsibility divides and inaction reads as reassurance.

Why

Two mechanisms run at once: diffusion divides the duty, and pluralistic ignorance works on interpretation, everyone reads everyone else's calm as evidence it is not an emergency. They make different predictions, since diffusion works over an intercom and the other needs visibility. Point at one person to defeat the first; say loudly that this is an emergency to defeat the second.

Read the lesson: The Bystander Effect and the Diffusion of Responsibility →

Practise The Bystander Effect and the Diffusion of Responsibility

The app has 6 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Psychology I is free to start.

More questions on The Bystander Effect and the Diffusion of Responsibility