Practice question · Multiple choice
Latané and Darley found that a lone bystander helped about 85% of the time and one among five helped about 31%. Why does adding witnesses make each individual less likely to act, when the need is unchanged?
Hints
- Two separate things change when four more people walk in. One is about duty, one is about interpretation.
- Everyone is standing still and looking calm. What does each person conclude from that?
Show the answer
C. Because responsibility divides and inaction reads as reassurance.
Why
Two mechanisms run at once: diffusion divides the duty, and pluralistic ignorance works on interpretation, everyone reads everyone else's calm as evidence it is not an emergency. They make different predictions, since diffusion works over an intercom and the other needs visibility. Point at one person to defeat the first; say loudly that this is an emergency to defeat the second.
Practise The Bystander Effect and the Diffusion of Responsibility
The app has 6 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Psychology I is free to start.
More questions on The Bystander Effect and the Diffusion of Responsibility
- First-aid courses teach you to point at one person and say "you, in the red coat, call an ambulance." Which…
- Match each clue to what it identifies.
- Latane and Darley describe helping as a chain of five decisions, any one of which can stop it. Put them in…
- Select every change that would WEAKEN the bystander effect and make helping more likely.