Sociology I / Inequality, Poverty and Social Exclusion
Practice question · Multiple choice

Sen argued that what matters is what a person is able to do and to be, rather than the income they hold. How does that reframing change what a poverty measure should try to capture?

Hints
  1. Ask what the same income buys for a person with a disability, a long commute or no local services.
  2. Two people with identical incomes can have very different real options.
Show the answer

C. It treats income as a means to opportunities, measuring capabilities instead of resources.

Why

The conversion rate from income to capability differs across people and places: illness, disability, care responsibilities and the availability of public services all change what a given sum makes possible. Sen’s point is not that income is irrelevant but that it is an instrument whose effectiveness varies, which is precisely what a resource-based threshold cannot see.

Read the lesson: Inequality, Poverty and Social Exclusion →

Practise Inequality, Poverty and Social Exclusion

The app has 5 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Sociology I is free to start.

More questions on Inequality, Poverty and Social Exclusion