A book rests on a table and a puck glides at constant velocity across frictionless ice. Newton's first law treats these as the same case. Why?

D. Because both have zero net force, and rest is not a special state.

The first law makes no distinction between rest and uniform motion, rest is the case where the constant velocity is zero. That is exactly what Aristotle got wrong: the intuition that motion needs a continuous cause comes from living in a world full of friction. It also implies no experiment distinguishes rest from constant velocity, which is Galilean relativity.