History II / Feudal Society
Practice question · Multiple choice

Susan Reynolds argued in Fiefs and Vassals that the "feudal system" is largely a construction of later lawyers. What is the core of that argument?

Hints
  1. Ask what happens if you go back to the charters and look at how the words are actually used.
  2. A system requires consistent terms; Reynolds found the terms were not consistent.
Show the answer

C. The terms fief and vassal are used loosely and inconsistently in the medieval sources themselves

Why

Her method is philological: read the documents rather than the textbooks, and the neat vocabulary dissolves into local variety. Land was certainly held in return for service, that is not in dispute. What is disputed is whether contemporaries had, or needed, a single coherent system of tenure, or whether academic lawyers built one afterwards and historians adopted it.

Read the lesson: Feudal Society →

Practise Feudal Society

The app has 4 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. History II is free to start.

More questions on Feudal Society