History II / The Extra-European World
Practice question · Sort into groups

Sort each claim by whether it belongs to the traditional account of European advantage or to the GREAT DIVERGENCE revision of it.

Groups: Traditional account · Great Divergence revision

Hints
  1. One account puts the divergence early and internal; the other puts it late and contingent.
  2. Pomeranz’s comparison is with one specific Chinese region, not with China as a whole.
Show the answer

Traditional account: European superiority was long established by 1750, European institutions and culture explain the lead by themselves

Great Divergence revision: Coal and colonial land relieved a constraint that bound China, The gap opened chiefly in the nineteenth century

Why

The revision has not been simply accepted, Broadberry and others date the divergence earlier on national-accounts evidence, but it changed the burden of proof. Claims of long-standing European superiority now have to be demonstrated against a specific comparable region, rather than assumed from the outcome.

Read the lesson: The Extra-European World →

Practise The Extra-European World

The app has 4 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. History II is free to start.

More questions on The Extra-European World