Philosophy I / Arguments, Validity and Soundness
Practice question · Sort into groups

Sort each argument by whether it is deductive or inductive.

Groups: Deductive · Inductive

Hints
  1. Ask whether the conclusion goes beyond what the premises already contain.
  2. Generalising from observed cases always reaches beyond the evidence.
Show the answer

Deductive: All humans are mortal; Socrates is human; so Socrates is mortal, If it rains the match is cancelled; it rains; so it is cancelled

Inductive: Every swan observed so far has been white; so all swans are white, This drug helped 90 of 100 patients; so it will probably help the next

Why

A deductive conclusion is already contained in its premises, so a valid deduction adds no information. Inductive conclusions genuinely go beyond the evidence, which is why they can be strong or weak but never valid.

Read the lesson: Arguments, Validity and Soundness →

Practise Arguments, Validity and Soundness

The app has 4 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Philosophy I is free to start.

More questions on Arguments, Validity and Soundness