Practice question · Multiple choice
Gardner's theory has been enormously influential in schools and has attracted little support from psychometric research. Why is a theory's classroom popularity not evidence for it?
Hints
- Separate two questions: is this useful to work with, and is it true?
- Ask what makes the theory appealing to a teacher, and whether that appeal bears on the evidence.
Show the answer
B. Because a framework can be useful to teach with and still be false.
Why
The framework encourages teachers to look for strengths a narrow measure would miss, and those are good instincts whether or not there are eight independent intelligences. The psychometric evidence bears on the structural claim, and there the record is thin. Adopting a theory because its consequences are appealing is not inference.
Practise Cognitive and Multiple Intelligences
The app has 5 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Psychology I is free to start.
More questions on Cognitive and Multiple Intelligences
- Select every statement that is TRUE about these theories.
- General cognitive ability predicts job performance across almost every occupation studied, better than…
- Gardner proposes several independent intelligences. The standard psychometric objection is that scores on…
- Order these from the NARROWEST view of intelligence to the BROADEST.
- Gardner and Sternberg both argue that traditional IQ tests measure something real but too narrow, rather than…
- Sort each claim by the theory it belongs to.