Practice question · Multiple choice
Human beings enjoy music, and the taste is universal across cultures. Why is that pair of facts not yet enough to establish that a taste for music is an adaptation?
Hints
- List everything music-liking requires: pitch perception, timing, emotional response. Were those built for music?
- "Everyone has it" and "it was selected for" are different claims. What would show the second?
Show the answer
B. Because universality is consistent with the trait being a by-product.
Why
Universality is weaker evidence than it looks, because a rival explanation predicts it just as well: pitch discrimination, temporal prediction and emotional response all have their own reasons for existing, none of them musical. The question is never whether a trait is useful or common, but whether variation in it affected fitness through the claimed function.
Practise Evolutionary Psychology
The app has 5 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Psychology I is free to start.
More questions on Evolutionary Psychology
- Evolutionary psychology explains the modern taste for sugar and fat by the EEA: the environment we adapted…
- Select every statement that is TRUE about evolutionary psychology.
- People solve the Wason selection task poorly when it is stated abstractly, but solve the same logical problem…
- Showing that a trait is useful today is enough to prove it is an evolutionary adaptation.
- Sort each trait as an adaptation, a by-product, or noise.
- Order the reasoning steps for establishing that a trait is an evolutionary adaptation.