Psychology I / Group Dynamics: Polarization, Groupthink, and Performance
Practice question · Multiple choice

Groupthink is most likely in groups that are cohesive, insulated and led by someone who states a preference early. Why would cohesion - usually a strength - become a liability for decision quality?

Hints
  1. Ask what a person risks by objecting in a group they want to stay part of.
  2. Nobody objects. What does the group conclude from that?
Show the answer

A. Because cohesion raises the cost of dissent.

Why

Cohesion does not remove disagreement; it raises the price of expressing it, and the doubter risks their standing. The damage compounds because the group reads the silence as consensus, pluralistic ignorance from the bystander lesson, applied to a boardroom. Every remedy works by lowering the cost of dissent, and Janis derived them from one administration with and without the safeguards.

Read the lesson: Group Dynamics: Polarization, Groupthink, and Performance →

Practise Group Dynamics: Polarization, Groupthink, and Performance

The app has 6 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Psychology I is free to start.

More questions on Group Dynamics: Polarization, Groupthink, and Performance