Practice question · Multiple choice
Groupthink is most likely in groups that are cohesive, insulated and led by someone who states a preference early. Why would cohesion - usually a strength - become a liability for decision quality?
Hints
- Ask what a person risks by objecting in a group they want to stay part of.
- Nobody objects. What does the group conclude from that?
Show the answer
A. Because cohesion raises the cost of dissent.
Why
Cohesion does not remove disagreement; it raises the price of expressing it, and the doubter risks their standing. The damage compounds because the group reads the silence as consensus, pluralistic ignorance from the bystander lesson, applied to a boardroom. Every remedy works by lowering the cost of dissent, and Janis derived them from one administration with and without the safeguards.
Practise Group Dynamics: Polarization, Groupthink, and Performance
The app has 6 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Psychology I is free to start.
More questions on Group Dynamics: Polarization, Groupthink, and Performance
- Trace how groupthink produces a decision nobody would have made alone. Put the steps in causal order.
- Select every statement that is TRUE about groupthink and social loafing.
- A committee of moderately cautious people discusses a decision and emerges more cautious than any member…
- Social loafing and social facilitation both concern what the presence of others does to performance - and…