Sort each consideration by whether it belongs to POETICS or to SOCIAL IMPLICATION.
Groups: Poetics · Social implication
- The recurring concerns that make the works recognisably related
- The internal logic developed across a body of work
- Whether promises made to a community can be kept
- A constraint adopted to force unfamiliar solutions
- Who bears the consequences when the project ends
- Whether participants are collaborators or material
Hints
- One column is answerable to the work; the other to people.
- Anything involving participants or consequences is social.
Show the answer
Poetics: The recurring concerns that make the works recognisably related, A constraint adopted to force unfamiliar solutions, The internal logic developed across a body of work
Social implication: Whether participants are collaborators or material, Who bears the consequences when the project ends, Whether promises made to a community can be kept
The right-hand column contains ethical questions rather than aesthetic ones, and that is the point of pairing them. A practice can have an exemplary poetics and be answerable to people it has treated as material, and the two assessments do not substitute for each other.
Practise Methodologies of Creation
The app has 6 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Sculpture I is free to start.
More questions on Methodologies of Creation
- Which are true of adopting a constraint as a working method?
- Complete the account of methodology.
- Poetics answers to internal logic, whilst social implication answers to external consequence. Why must an…
- How many methods for getting outside one's own preferences does this lesson list?
- Arrange the questions a project involving other people must answer, in the order they should be asked.
- Why is "the participants had a good experience" an insufficient account of a participatory project?