Sociology I / Family, Gender and Sexuality
Practice question · Select all that apply

Which findings count against Murdock’s 1949 claim that the nuclear family is universal?

Hints
  1. Three of these are ethnographic counter-cases; one denies something no counter-case shows.
  2. The universal claim that survives is weaker than Murdock’s and concerns function rather than form.
Show the answer
  • A. Nayar descent and residence arrangements did not require a co-resident husband and father
  • B. Matrifocal households are a normal and stable form in parts of the Caribbean
  • D. Israeli kibbutzim organised child-rearing collectively rather than within couples
Why

The three counter-cases attack the form, not the function. Every known society provides somehow for reproduction and child-rearing; what varies is whether that provision takes the shape of a co-resident couple with their children. The third option would deny the weak claim as well, and nothing in the record supports it.

Read the lesson: Family, Gender and Sexuality →

Practise Family, Gender and Sexuality

The app has 5 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Sociology I is free to start.

More questions on Family, Gender and Sexuality