Courses / History I
Historical Sources

Visual and Iconographic Sources

History I 550 words Free to read

No Image Is a Window

The temptation with images is to treat them as transparent — as though a painting shows you a room and a photograph shows you an event. Every image is made, by someone, for someone, with choices at every step: what to include, where to stand, what to leave outside the edge.

The frame is the first argument. What is outside it was decided by someone, and you cannot see the decision — which makes framing the most effective form of distortion ever invented, because it leaves no trace inside the image.

Photographs Lie Without Faking Anything

The nineteenth century believed the camera could not lie, and the belief survives in the phrase "photographic evidence". But a photograph involves:

ChoiceEffect
FramingWhat is cropped out is invisible and unrecoverable
MomentA face mid-blink reads as drunk; mid-word, as hysterical
Angle and lensLow angle ennobles; long lens compresses a crowd into a mob
CaptionNames the event and often supplies the meaning entirely
SelectionWhich frame of the roll was published, and by whom

Not one of these requires manipulating the negative. And the historical record is worse than that: early photographs required long exposures, so many "documentary" images of war are staged — Roger Fenton's Crimean cannonballs were arranged, and Civil War photographers moved corpses to improve the composition. The Falling Soldier, Iwo Jima, the Reichstag flag: the most famous "instants" of the twentieth century are contested precisely because the camera's authority made staging worth the trouble.

The rule: treat a photograph as testimony from a witness with a position, not as a fact. Ask who held the camera, why they were there, what they were paid for, and — always — what is just outside the frame.

Maps Are Arguments With Coastlines

A map is a projection: the earth is a sphere, the page is flat, and no flattening preserves everything. You choose which distortion to accept.

The rest of the cartographic arguments are less subtle: what is at the centre; what is named and in whose language; which borders are drawn firm and which dotted; what is left blank. "Blank" spaces on colonial maps were full of people — the blankness was a claim that nothing was there worth recording, and a rather effective one.

The historian's payoff: an image's unwitting testimony is usually its best. A propaganda poster is unreliable about conditions and authoritative about anxieties — it shows exactly what the regime feared people believed. A painting's background — the tools on the wall, the food on the table, the clothes of the person nobody was looking at — was not what the painter was arguing about, and is therefore the part least distorted by the argument.

Practise this lesson

The explanation above is free to read. The graded practice for this lesson lives in the Tryals app.

12practice questions
2interactive scenes
Start History I free

Historical Sources