Practice question · Multiple choice
Two photographers stand in the same place with the same lens at a demonstration. One frames so that the line of police is just outside the right edge; the other includes it. Why is that a claim about the event rather than a matter of taste?
Hints
- Ask what a viewer of each picture is able to know.
- The edge is not a technical boundary; it is the boundary of the evidence.
Show the answer
B. The edge decides what is present; excluding police makes the crowd the whole situation.
Why
Because the edge fixes the limit of the evidence. A viewer of the tighter frame cannot know the police are there, so the picture asserts a crowd without a confrontation. Neither frame lies about the light, and both are complete photographs, which is exactly why the choice of edge is an editorial act rather than a preference.
Practise The Frame: What Is In and What Is Out
The app has 4 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Photography I is free to start.
More questions on The Frame: What Is In and What Is Out
- Sort each element by its relation to the frame.
- Cropping a full 35 mm frame to a square discards one third of the negative area.
- Complete the vocabulary of the frame.
- Which of these are true of the frame as an act of exclusion?
- A painter builds an image by addition, whereas a photographer operates strictly through exclusion. What…
- Match each term to what it names.
- Arrange these acts of exclusion in the order they occur in the making of a picture.
- A typical non-professional single-lens reflex viewfinder showed less of the frame than actually reached the…
- Burch divided off-frame space into four segments, one beyond each edge of the frame.