Practice question · Put in order
Arrange these contributions in chronological order.
- Ruskin on honesty in the use of materials
- British direct carving in the interwar decades
- Moore's extensive later bronze casting
- Contemporary use of fugitive and found materials
- Gabo and Pevsner, Realistic Manifesto (1920)
Hints
- Ruskin is the nineteenth-century root.
- The manifesto precedes the interwar carving practice.
Show the answer
- Ruskin on honesty in the use of materials
- Gabo and Pevsner, Realistic Manifesto (1920)
- British direct carving in the interwar decades
- Moore's extensive later bronze casting
- Contemporary use of fugitive and found materials
Why
The sequence contains its own commentary: a doctrine argued in the nineteenth century, made practice in the interwar years, contradicted from outside in 1920 and from inside by its own advocates later, and finally replaced by a weaker claim that everyone can use.
Practise Materials as Language
The app has 5 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Sculpture I is free to start.
More questions on Materials as Language
- Sort each statement by whether it argues FOR truth to materials or AGAINST it.
- Direct carving treats the physical block as an active participant rather than an inert substrate. What…
- Why is it not hypocrisy that Moore cast extensively in bronze after arguing for truth to materials?
- Gabo and Pevsner's Realistic Manifesto renounced mass as a sculptural element.
- Complete the account of materials as language.
- How many principal sculptural methods does this lesson distinguish, once construction is included?
- Arrange these developments in the relation between sculpture and its materials.
- Truth to materials survives intact as the standard doctrine of contemporary sculpture.