Practice question · Put in order
Arrange these developments in the relation between sculpture and its materials.
- Gabo and Pevsner renounce mass altogether
- Ruskin argues for honesty in the use of materials
- Illusionistic carving in which stone imitates other substances
- The weaker claim survives: the material is part of the content
- British modernists adopt direct carving as a practice
Hints
- The doctrine is a reaction to what preceded it.
- The surviving claim is the most recent and the least dogmatic.
Show the answer
- Illusionistic carving in which stone imitates other substances
- Ruskin argues for honesty in the use of materials
- British modernists adopt direct carving as a practice
- Gabo and Pevsner renounce mass altogether
- The weaker claim survives: the material is part of the content
Why
The last step is where the argument actually settled. Nobody now defends the strong doctrine and nobody treats material as neutral either, the material is part of the content, and how much it should dominate is a decision per work rather than a rule.
Practise Materials as Language
The app has 5 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Sculpture I is free to start.
More questions on Materials as Language
- Sort each statement by whether it argues FOR truth to materials or AGAINST it.
- Direct carving treats the physical block as an active participant rather than an inert substrate. What…
- Why is it not hypocrisy that Moore cast extensively in bronze after arguing for truth to materials?
- Gabo and Pevsner's Realistic Manifesto renounced mass as a sculptural element.
- Complete the account of materials as language.
- How many principal sculptural methods does this lesson distinguish, once construction is included?
- Truth to materials survives intact as the standard doctrine of contemporary sculpture.
- Arrange these contributions in chronological order.