Practice question · Multiple choice
A country doubles the share of its young people entering university and finds the odds ratio between class origins almost unchanged. How can both facts be true at once?
Hints
- Ask who takes up new places first when a level expands.
- The same arithmetic separates absolute from relative mobility in the class literature.
Show the answer
C. Rates rose across all origins whilst relative gaps persisted, as expansion adds places without altering relative advantage.
Why
This is the education version of the mobility myth. More places mean more people from every origin arrive, so absolute participation rises everywhere; the odds ratio moves only if the origin effect at that transition weakens. Where advantaged families take up the new places first, the ratio can hold almost exactly steady while the headline participation figure doubles.
Practise Education and Social Mobility
The app has 6 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Sociology I is free to start.
More questions on Education and Social Mobility
- Michael Young coined the word meritocracy in 1958 and objected for decades to the way politicians used it.…
- Which claims about Boudon’s primary and secondary effects of social origin are correct?
- Arrange the steps by which expansion of a level of education can leave relative chances unchanged.
- Educational expansion increases absolute participation across all social classes, yet relative class…
- In which year did Michael Young publish The Rise of the Meritocracy, the satire that coined the word?
- Sort each intervention by whether it addresses primary or secondary effects of social origin.
- Shavit and Blossfeld’s conclusion that educational expansion left origin effects broadly intact has been…
- Estimate Spain’s early school leaving rate in 2023, as a percentage of 18 to 24 year olds.