Practice question · Multiple choice
Michael Young coined the word meritocracy in 1958 and objected for decades to the way politicians used it. Why did he regard a fully meritocratic society as a dystopia rather than an ideal?
Hints
- Ask what happens to solidarity when everyone believes the hierarchy is deserved.
- The satire is aimed at the self-justification of the winners, not at ability itself.
Show the answer
A. Allocating rank by measured ability leaves the successful entitled and the rest with no defence
Why
Young’s target was the legitimation, not the selection. An aristocracy knows its position is arbitrary and can be argued with; a meritocratic elite believes its position is earned, which removes the grounds for objection and strips the unsuccessful of any account of themselves except failure. That is the dystopia the book describes and the reading almost every political use of the word discards.
Practise Education and Social Mobility
The app has 6 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Sociology I is free to start.
More questions on Education and Social Mobility
- Which claims about Boudon’s primary and secondary effects of social origin are correct?
- Arrange the steps by which expansion of a level of education can leave relative chances unchanged.
- Educational expansion increases absolute participation across all social classes, yet relative class…
- In which year did Michael Young publish The Rise of the Meritocracy, the satire that coined the word?
- Sort each intervention by whether it addresses primary or secondary effects of social origin.
- Shavit and Blossfeld’s conclusion that educational expansion left origin effects broadly intact has been…
- A country doubles the share of its young people entering university and finds the odds ratio between class…
- Estimate Spain’s early school leaving rate in 2023, as a percentage of 18 to 24 year olds.