Practice question · Multiple choice
Chicago sociology and Parsonian functionalism took fundamentally different stances towards empirical reality. What follows from where the researcher stands in each tradition?
Hints
- Where does each tradition locate the primary source of sociological insight?
- Does a high level of theoretical abstraction mean an absence of systematic classification?
Show the answer
C. Chicago builds concepts upwards from concrete empirical locales
Why
Confusing the scale of analysis with a total rejection of empirical data misses Parsons's intent to classify total social systems. Similarly, reversing the observational standpoint misattributes Chicago's immersion in local settings to Parsonian abstraction.
Practise Sociology Becomes a Profession
The app has 5 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Sociology I is free to start.
More questions on Sociology Becomes a Profession
- Arrange these landmarks in the professionalisation of sociology, earliest first.
- Du Bois’s The Philadelphia Negro was based on a house-to-house survey of a single city ward and appeared…
- The Thomas theorem states that situations defined as real are real in their consequences. Which claims follow…
- Mills attacked grand theory and abstracted empiricism together in 1959, although they look like opposite…
- Complete the account of Parsons’s and Merton’s versions of functionalism.
- Sort each research practice by whether it belongs to the Chicago tradition or to structural functionalism.
- Estimate how many years separate the founding of the first American sociology department and the publication…
- In which year was the first university department of sociology in the United States founded?
- Parsons’s functionalism contains no account of social change, because a system in equilibrium cannot by…