Practice question · Multiple choice
Mills attacked grand theory and abstracted empiricism together in 1959, although they look like opposite sins. Why did he think one objection disposed of both?
Hints
- Ask what a theory too abstract to test and a measurement chosen because it is easy have in common.
- Mills wanted the link between personal troubles and public issues, and thought both styles had cut it.
Show the answer
C. That each had detached its procedure from the substantive problems of actual people in actual historical situations
Why
Both, on his account, had let method dictate subject matter, one by building a conceptual apparatus with nothing determinate to say, the other by studying whatever the instrument could capture. His alternative was the sociological imagination: connecting a private trouble to the historical structure that produces it.
Practise Sociology Becomes a Profession
The app has 5 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Sociology I is free to start.
More questions on Sociology Becomes a Profession
- Arrange these landmarks in the professionalisation of sociology, earliest first.
- Du Bois’s The Philadelphia Negro was based on a house-to-house survey of a single city ward and appeared…
- The Thomas theorem states that situations defined as real are real in their consequences. Which claims follow…
- Complete the account of Parsons’s and Merton’s versions of functionalism.
- Sort each research practice by whether it belongs to the Chicago tradition or to structural functionalism.
- Estimate how many years separate the founding of the first American sociology department and the publication…
- Chicago sociology and Parsonian functionalism took fundamentally different stances towards empirical reality.…
- In which year was the first university department of sociology in the United States founded?
- Parsons’s functionalism contains no account of social change, because a system in equilibrium cannot by…