History II / The Age of Revolutions I: the Atlantic and France
Practice question · Sort into groups

Sort each position on the French Revolution by whether it belongs to the SOCIAL interpretation or to the REVISIONIST critique of it.

Groups: Social interpretation · Revisionist critique

Hints
  1. One reading explains the Revolution by what classes wanted; the other denies the classes were as described.
  2. Ask who the revolutionaries actually were by occupation.
Show the answer

Social interpretation: A bourgeois revolution destroying a feudal order, Lefebvre and Soboul are the leading exponents

Revisionist critique: The class categories fit the actual participants poorly, The Revolution is best read as a political and discursive event, Cobban and Furet mounted the main attacks

Why

The revisionist case rests partly on prosopography: the men of the assemblies were overwhelmingly lawyers and officeholders rather than merchants or manufacturers, which fits a bourgeois-capitalist revolution badly. The reply is that a class can be represented by people who are not typical of it, and that is where the argument still sits.

Read the lesson: The Age of Revolutions I: the Atlantic and France →

Practise The Age of Revolutions I: the Atlantic and France

The app has 4 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. History II is free to start.

More questions on The Age of Revolutions I: the Atlantic and France