Practice question · Multiple choice
Kinsey’s reports were based on careful interviewing but on volunteers, prisoners and other non-random groups. Why does that make their prevalence estimates unreliable even though the interviews were well conducted?
Hints
- Separate the two things that can go wrong: what people say, and who was asked.
- A perfect interview with an unrepresentative group gives a perfect measurement of that group.
Show the answer
B. Interview quality shapes reports, but sampling decides if results represent a population
Why
Careful interviewing improves the accuracy of each answer and does nothing about the frame. If the people interviewed differ systematically from the population, the resulting percentages describe the volunteers, and no amount of interviewing skill converts them into national figures. The same distinction separates sampling bias from measurement error everywhere in the discipline.
Practise Intimacy, Gender and Sexuality
The app has 3 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Sociology I is free to start.
More questions on Intimacy, Gender and Sexuality
- Which claims does Foucault make against the repressive hypothesis?
- Giddens argues that the pure relationship is held together by external obligation rather than by the…
- Complete the vocabulary of Giddens’s account of modern intimacy.
- Match each account of contemporary intimacy to its author.
- Arrange these works on sexuality and intimacy, earliest first.
- Estimate the percentage of marriages in Spain in recent years that were between same-sex couples.
- Sort each claim by whether it belongs to Giddens’s optimistic reading of contingency or to Illouz’s critical…
- Rich argued in 1980 that heterosexuality should be analysed as an institution rather than as a preference.…
- Hochschild’s concept of emotional labour was introduced to describe a paid job requirement rather than the…
- Beck and Beck-Gernsheim describe modern love as individualised rather than liberated. What follows from this…
- Arrange the steps of Giddens’s argument from external constraint to the pure relationship.