Sociology I / Intimacy, Gender and Sexuality
Practice question · Multiple choice

Kinsey’s reports were based on careful interviewing but on volunteers, prisoners and other non-random groups. Why does that make their prevalence estimates unreliable even though the interviews were well conducted?

Hints
  1. Separate the two things that can go wrong: what people say, and who was asked.
  2. A perfect interview with an unrepresentative group gives a perfect measurement of that group.
Show the answer

B. Interview quality shapes reports, but sampling decides if results represent a population

Why

Careful interviewing improves the accuracy of each answer and does nothing about the frame. If the people interviewed differ systematically from the population, the resulting percentages describe the volunteers, and no amount of interviewing skill converts them into national figures. The same distinction separates sampling bias from measurement error everywhere in the discipline.

Read the lesson: Intimacy, Gender and Sexuality →

Practise Intimacy, Gender and Sexuality

The app has 3 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Sociology I is free to start.

More questions on Intimacy, Gender and Sexuality