Sociology I / Intimacy, Gender and Sexuality
Practice question · Sort into groups

Sort each claim by whether it belongs to Giddens’s optimistic reading of contingency or to Illouz’s critical one.

Groups: Giddens’s reading · Illouz’s reading

Hints
  1. Both agree that external constraints have weakened; they disagree about what fills the space.
  2. Ask which column treats the absence of obligation as a gain and which as an exposure.
Show the answer

Giddens’s reading: Personal life is becoming democratic on the model of public life, Relationships that continue only while both wish it are a gain in autonomy

Illouz’s reading: Insecurity generated by that market is experienced as a personal shortcoming, The vocabulary of choice and self-optimisation reshapes emotional life unequally

Why

The disagreement is not about the facts of contemporary coupling, which both accept. It is about what a contingent bond does to people differently positioned to bear the contingency, and Illouz’s strongest evidence is that the resulting distress is systematically patterned by gender, age and class while being experienced by those affected as an individual failure.

Read the lesson: Intimacy, Gender and Sexuality →

Practise Intimacy, Gender and Sexuality

The app has 3 more questions on this lesson, and keeps your place in the course. Sociology I is free to start.

More questions on Intimacy, Gender and Sexuality